[ 李儉 ]——(2016-11-7) / 已閱17322次
甚至限制我國企業參加國際展會的參展機會和面積的初衷。一些發達國家把知識產權作為維護本國利益和經濟安全的一項戰略資源，一些企業將知識產權視為獲取市場競爭優勢的一種重要手段，這充分表現在他們強烈的保護意識和積極主動的實際行動上。所以我國的企業要尊重知識，尊重創新的前提下，自己不侵犯別人的知識產權，同時也要學會保護自己的權利不受他人的侵犯。
The reason why Chinese enterprise frequently encounter claims while attending exhibition abroad cannot exclude that foreign powers suppress exported products from China and restrain Chinese enterprises of the opportunities and square of attending international exhibition.
Some advanced countries regard IPR as a strategic resource to safeguard its own economic benefits and safety and some enterprises take IPR as an important means to acquire market competition advantage through showing their strong sense of protection and practical act. Our enterprise shall not infringe other’s IPR and learn how to protect its own IPR from infringement under the premise of respecting knowledge and innovation simultaneously.
（二） 尋找侵權證據
Finding evidence of tort
尋找侵權線索實際上是尋找國外公司侵犯我們知識產權的證據，在國外取證一定要符合國外的法律規定，每個國家的法律規定都有所不同，在中國是合法的取證手段，在國外可能被看成是非法，其證據將被認定無效，有的證據形式是合法的，但是我們取證的手段不符合國外的法律規定，同樣該證據也無效。關于取證最好還是委托國外的律師來全權處理。
Finding tort clue means to find the evidence that foreign company infringes our IPR. Obtaining evidence abroad, we shall comply with local laws and regulations because laws and regulations regarding obtaining evidence vary from country to country. Means proved to be legitimate while obtaining evidence in China may be regarded illegally abroad. If the means of obtaining evidence is proved to be illegal, then the evidence acquired will be regarded null and void. It’s better to entrust foreign lawyer to obtain evidence.
（三） 及時投訴
Claim timely
在國際展會上，我國參展企業的知識產權同樣面臨被其他國家的企業侵權的情形。河南洛陽名特玻璃技術有限公司在一次國際展會上發現奧地利一家公司完全照抄自己的鋼化爐生產線宣傳材料，名特公司立即在律師的陪同下對其提出警告，并勒令其糾正錯誤，經我方據理力爭和強烈要求下，外方改正其作法，并承認錯誤。
On international exhibition, our exhibitors similarly face the situation that IPR may be infringed by enterprises from other countries. Henan Luoyang Mingte glass technical co.,ltd. once found an Austrian company completely copied its own publicity materials on an international exhibition. Mingte company , accompanied by lawyer, addressed warning to this company and compelled it to revise its mistake. Upon our strong argument on the just grounds and request, foreign party finally revised their act and acknowledged their mistake.
總之，我國參展企業應重視參展過程中侵權和被侵權的可能性存在，事先綜合分析各項因素的存在。只有這樣，參展企業才能避免侵權的同時，自身權益也能夠得到有效保護。
In a word, our exhibitors shall put emphasis on the existing possibilities of infringement and being infringed on the exhibition and analyze various kinds of elements previously. Only by doing this, exhibitors can avoid infringement of other’s IPR and protect its rights and benefits effectively.
【作者】李儉，男，現為北京中銀（南京）律師事務所高級合伙人、涉外法律事務部主任，南京大學法律碩士，美國馬里蘭大學和國際法學院高級訪問學者,南京市律師協會涉外業務委員會副主任、建筑房地產專業委員會委員，南京市律師協會公司于證券業務委員會委員。業務主營：涉外業務，建筑房地產及公司與證券業務。
[Author] James Lee, born in 1967,Han nationality, senior partner of Beijing Zhongyin (Nanjing) law firm, director of International business dept.master degree of Nanjing university, senior visiting scholar of Maryland university and International law institute, Arbitrator of Changzhou arbitration Committee, Commissioner of International Legal Business Working Committee of Nanjing Lawyers Association
Commissioner of Construction and Real Estate Committee of Nanjing Lawyers Association.
Mainly focus on foreign-oriented legal service, construction and real estate as well as investment and M&A corporate-related legal service.
總共3頁 [1] [2] 3
上一頁
